lproven: (Default)
Goulash, or guláš as it's called around here, is a popular local dish. But the "real thing" is made with beef, so I can't eat it.

Now, I cook quite a bit -- I normally prepare at least 1 big dish a week from fresh ingredients then eat it for a few days -- but I tend to cheat & use pre-made sauces or concentrates as a base. I've yet to find a vegetarian goulash sauce, so I Googled 4 or 5 recipes and them improvised something from all of them put together. I avoided any fake meat or meat substitutes, but I did use a sachet of guláš spice mix. I think it was mainly paprika, to be honest.
Read more... )
lproven: (Default)
I often get challenged when people see how many friends I have online. 846 on Facebook at the moment, I believe, for example, and 548 on Livejournal. People seem to think that's impossible, or that I must just follow anyone who asks.

But no, actually, there are only an honoured handful of "imaginary Internet friends" as I call them; I turn down any requests I get from people I don't know, unless they can provide a quite exceptionally good justification. I think there are under a dozen such people either on FB or LJ - still under 20 between them. I turn down lots of requests from random strangers on Facebook and LinkedIn and am followed by quite a lot of them on Twitter and a few on LJ, for instance. (Not that the latter is a problem at all -- I am honoured, in fact.)

No, all those thousand-odd people are actually real-life friends and acquaintances, odd as it may seem, any one of whom I'd be happy to go for a pint or two with at the drop of a hat. The handful of people I haven't met -- all of whom I've spent hours talking with online - I would be delighted to get the chance to actually meet and get to know IRL.

This does seem to be a lot more than most people; some have said to me "I think I know a total of about 150 people in the world! How can you know so many?"

Well, actually, in researching this piece, I've discovered that about 150 is a fairly typical value for what is called Dunbar's Number -- or as I think of it, the size of someone's monkeysphere, as described in this article on a humour site some years ago -- an inglorious location for something that I think describes quite an important idea.

My monkeysphere is very big. Perhaps I am more than normally gregarious, I don't know, but the social Internet permits me to keep track of a lot of people... And I've been on the Internet for a very long time. I am quite proud of my 21-year-old email address -- I've been paying for my own access via the excellent CIX that long. But I was online some six years before that, on JANET at university, a facility I used quite heavily.

Partly I manage such a large circle of friends by subdividing it into different circles - CIXen, geeks, goths, bikers, cow-orkers, SF fans and so on. It can throw me for a loop when someone unexpectedly crops up in more than one circle, although some people span three or even four. I seldom try to interconnect them any more -- it rarely works.

But many people seem to find this inconcievable.

So I am curious... Do many others think that this is unreasonably large? Am I that unusual? I know far more gregarious people than I -- my old friend Rob Neuschul is a good case in point, for instance.
lproven: (Default)
1. Don't pick on the weak. It's immoral. Don't antagonize the strong without cause, it's stupid.

2. Don't hate women. It's a waste of time.

3. Invest in yourself. Material things come to those that have self-actualized.

4. Get in a fistfight, even if you are going to lose.

5. As a former Marine, take it from me. Don't join the military, unless you want to risk getting your balls blown off to secure other people's economic or political interests.

6. If something has a direct benefit to an individual or a class of people, and a theoretical, abstract, or amorphous benefit to everybody else, realize that the proponent's intentions are to benefit the former, not the latter, no matter what bullshit they try to feed you.

7. Don't be a Republican. They are self-dealing crooks with no sense of honor or patriotism to their fellow citizens. If you must be a Republican, don't be a 'conservative.' They are whining, bitching, complaining, simple-minded self-righteous idiots who think they're perpetual victims. Listen to talk radio for a while, you'll see what I mean.

8. Don't take proffered advice without a critical analysis. 90% of all advice is intended to benefit the proponent, not the recipient. Actually, the number is probably closer to 97%, but I don't want to come off as cynical.

9. You'll spend your entire life listening to people tell you how much you owe them. You don't owe the vast majority of people shit.

10. Don't undermine your fellow young men. Mentor the young men that come after you. Society recognizes that you have the potential to be the most powerful force in society. It scares them. Society does not find young men sympathetic. They are afraid of you, both individually and collectively. Law enforcement's primary purpose is to suppress you.

11. As a young man, you're on your own. Society divides and conquers. Unlike women who have advocates looking out for them (NOW, Women's Study Departments, government, non-profit organizations, political advocacy groups) almost no one is looking out for you.

12. Young men provide the genius and muscle by which our society thrives. Look at the Silicon Valley. By in large, it was not old men or women that created the revolution we live. Realize that society steals your contributions, secures it with our intellectual property laws, and then takes credit and the rewards where none is due.

13. Know that few people have your best interests at heart. Your mother does. Your father probably does (if he stuck around). Your siblings are on your side. Everybody else worries about themselves.

14. Don't be afraid to tell people to 'fuck off' when need be. It is an important skill to acquire. As they say, speak your piece, even if your voice shakes.

15. Acquire empathy, good interpersonal skills, and confidence. Learn to read body language and non-verbal communication. Don't just concentrate on your vocational or technical skills, or you'll find your wife fucking somebody else.

16. Keep fit.

17. Don't speak ill of your wife/girlfriend. Back her up against the world, even if she's wrong. She should know that you have her back. When she needs your help, give it. She should know that you'll take her part.

18. Don't cheat on your wife/girlfriend. If you must cheat, don't humiliate her. Don't risk having your transgressions come back to her or her friends. Don't do it where you live. Don't do it with people in your social circle. Don't shit in your own back yard.

19. If your girlfriend doesn't make you feel good about yourself and bring joy to your life, fire her. That's what girlfriends are for.

20. Don't bother with 'emotional affairs.' They are just a vehicle for women to flirt and have someone make them feel good about themselves. That's the part of a relationship they want. For you it is a lot of work and investment in time. If they are having an emotional affair with you, they're probably fucking someone else.

21. Becoming a woman's friend and confidant is not going to get you into an intimate relationship. If you haven't gotten the girl within a reasonably short period of time, chances are you won't ever get her. She'll end up confiding to you about the sexual adventures she's having with someone else.

22. Have and nurture friendships with women.

23. Realize that love is a numbers game. Guys fall in love easily. You're going to see some girl and feel like you'll die if you don't get her. If she rejects you, move on to the next one. It's her loss.

24. Don't be an Internet troll. Got out and live life. There is not a cadre of beautiful women advertising on Craigslist to have NSA sex with you. Beautiful women don't need to advertise. The websites that advertise with attractive women's photos and claims of loneliness are baloney. All they want is your money and your personal information so that they can market to you. The posts on Craigslist by young 'women' seeking NSA sex, and asking for a picture are just a bunch of gay troll pic collectors. This is especially true if the post uses common gay lexicon like 'hole' as in 'fuck my hole' or seeks 'masculine' men, or uses the word 'cock' (except in the context of 'Don't send a cock shot.') There are women on Craigslist. They are easily recognizable by their 2-5 paragraph postings. Most are in their 30's or older.

25. When you become a man in full, know that people will get in your way. People who are attracted to you will somehow manage to step in your path. Gay guys will give you 'the look.' Old people will somehow stumble in front of you at the worst time. Don't get frustrated. Just step aside and go about your business. Know that these are passive aggressive methods to get you to acknowledge their existence.

26. Don't gay-bash. Don't mentally or physically abuse people because of who they are, or how they present themselves. It's none of your business to try to intimidate people into conformity.

27. If you're gay, admit it to yourself, your parents, your friends and society at large. Be prepared to get harassed. See rule 14. If someone threatens you or assaults you, call the cops. Have them arrested. You have no obligation to self sacrifice because of who you are. As a gay person, you'll have more social freedom than straight men. Use it to protect yourself. Be prepared to get out of Dodge if your orientation makes your life unbearable. Move to San Francisco, New York, Atlanta, or New Orleans. You'll find a welcoming community there.

28. Don't be a poser. Avoid being one of those dudes who puts a surfboard on top of their car, but never surfs, or a dude with a powder coated fixed gear bike and a messenger bag, but was never a messenger. Live the life. Earn your bona fides.

29. Don't believe the crap about the patriarchy. More women are accepted and attend college. More degrees are awarded to women than men. Women outlive men. More men commit suicide. Men are twice as likely to be victims of violence, including murder. If you consider sexual assaults in prisons, twice as many men are raped as women (society thinks prison rape is funny). The streets are littered with homeless men, sprinkled with a few homeless women. Statically, women are happier than men. The myth that girls are being cheated by are educational system is belied by the fact that schools are bastions of femininity, mostly run by and taught by women. Girls outperform boys in school. It is the boys in school getting fucked over, and prescribed Ritalin for being boys. Real wages for men are falling, while real wages for women are rising. Just because someone says something enough times, doesn't make it true. You have nothing to feel guilty about.

30. Remember, 97% of all advice is worthless. Take what you can use, and trash the rest.

vicioustwist
san francisco
02-15-07

Taken from here, copyedited and cleaned-up a bit.
lproven: (Default)
Interesting news story from the Beeb about the mighty Russian-owned social network, Zhivoy Zhurnal - or ZheZhe for short. In Roman, that would be... "LJ".

LiveJournal: Russia's unlikely internet giant
As Russia prepares to elect a new president this weekend, voters are more fired up than they have been for a decade. It's partly due to an internet revolution that has challenged the state's power to control public opinion - and to the blogging platform LiveJournal.
lproven: (Default)
This is part of an email I wrote to a friend. Some of it is out of context, but there are bits of it I quite liked, so I thought I'd post it.

The friend is an English Literature graduate who has a very vague interest in science, but regards it as an amusing game and delights in stories that appear to poke holes in it, such as the faster-than-light neutrinos one. I sent him a couple of links I thought would possibly interest him - first, the Bad Astronomy blog's take on the FTL-neutrino result and then Jean Baptiste Queru's lovely little piece on the complexity of modern computing.


Read the second one first.

It's totally irrelevant, but it explains why such subjects are really hard and difficult to explain without a very VERY large amount of background knowledge.

To the point that in the modern world, there is almost no single thing that can be understood in a single lifetime. Collectively, we know so much about the world that no one human mind and brain can hold everything there is to know about, say, a grain of sand.

But if you have a little bit of the right kind of education, you know where to start, where to get a toe in a crack, and you can climb up the rock-face.

The snag is that if you don't have that specific special kind of education - if you have, say, a liberal-arts education - then you don't have that first tiny opening to put a toe into. And without that, there is no way up the wall at all. The only way is to walk away and spend several whole years doing nothing but solidly reading to educate yourself, and then you have the tiny crack and can start to climb. Several years of work to begin a climb that will take the rest of your life.

And I think that is tragic. That is why I think that pure arts education is, ultimately, a waste of time and effort. It doesn't equip you to understand the real world. It just shows you pretty pictures.

The best arts education, one that results from decades of work and a professorship or two, generally gives someone an excellent and unsurpassed understanding of the view of the other people standing on the ground. Some of them are very beautiful. It's a very nice view. It tells you what the other people standing on the ground think. It's not the real world, it's just an artificial, created thing which is not one millionth of a millionth of the mind-shattering real world.

A good understanding of the arts is something lovely and arguably well worth having, but it is to stand in a single small room admiring a handful of paintings on the walls and never to look out of the window and realise that you are in an airship, sailing along over the most astoundingly beautiful landscapes, over seas and mountains and forests and lakes and mighty cities filled with museums and universities and films and concerts - over all the knowledge and the beauty that the whole universe contains.

You seem to think that between us we could, as some sort of Socratic dialogue, write a book that would explain all of science to an arts graduate. Not so. One book, even one a thousand pages long, could not begin to provide a needle to scratch the surface of the rock-face.

You need to spend about a decade of your youth studying science to even be able to see the crack to put your toe into to start to climb the rock-face.

I gave up formally studying science nearly 25y ago. I am such a short distance up the rockface that my waist or knees are still level with your head, and I will probably never get any higher.

But from up here, I can see a view crammed with wonders and marvels that you and every other arts graduate, sitting or standing on the ground, cannot even begin to imagine. If I try to tell you, you will simply not believe me, it is so vast, so amazing, so wonderful, so beautiful.

The shortest, clearest description of a tiny part of it that I have ever seen was Carl Sagan's Cosmos TV series. It is dated but it is wonderful, as in, filled with wonders and it will fill you with wonders. But it will take you some 13 hours to watch it, and that is like peering through a pinhole for an instant at the most beautiful sight that anyone could ever see - it is an eyeblink.

It's like the Venerable Bede's famous quote:

"O King, the present life of men on earth is like the flight of a single sparrow through the hall where, in winter, you sit with your captains and ministers. Entering at one door and leaving by another, while it is inside it is untouched by the wintry storm; but this brief interval of calm is over in a moment, and it returns to the winter whence it came, vanishing from your sight."

You can watch it for free here, in lo-res Youtube glory:
Episode 1 - The Shores Of The Cosmic Ocean
Episode 2 - One Voice In The Cosmic Fugue
Episode 3 - The Harmony Of The Worlds
Episode 4 - Heaven & Hell
Episode 5 - Blues for a Red Planet
Episode 6 - Traveller's Tales
Episode 7 - The Backbone of the Night
Episode 8 - Journeys in Space & Time
Episode 9 - The Lives of the Stars
Episode 10 - The Edge of Forever
Episode 11 - The Persistence of Memory
Episode 12 - Encyclopædia Galactica
Episode 13 - Who Speaks for Earth?

I wonder if you could even spare the time - one hour of each workday evening for two weeks - to watch Cosmos right through?

The sum total of the demonstrable truths of what we can tell about the world is called "science". It isn't a thing, it's not a worldview or a state of mind or a process. It's just a very big list of facts, carefully worked out and tested.

But our modern educational system says that all this is just an alternative and that it's perfectly OK to sail through secondary school and university, choosing to completely ignore the whole thing and just learn about, say, one type of music or one type of poetry.

This is an injustice, a mistake, so vast that I can't find the words to describe it.

It is one that you can undo, but to do so will require dedicating a significant portion of the rest of your life to it.

It is not something one can acquire from a few chats in the pub and writing them down.

Meanwhile, back to the one-room art gallery in the airship for a moment.

The religious mindset is to say that the paintings in the room are the whole world and that you must completely ignore the view out of the window, that everything else you can see is all lies. It is, ultimately, nothing more than hate and fear of the truth. The different religions can't even agree on a set of paintings, but all agree that the truth is to be ignored and denied. They say that what is most important is not observation, but the magic property of belief in the images in the paintings.

I do not care how beautiful the paintings are. I do not care if the paintings offer the greatest source of reassurance against fear, that they tell one that one's life has meaning and matters and is important when one needs that feeling of safety more than ever.

No. What matters is that they deny the truth. They tell their faithful not to believe in experience, in reality, but in myths that cannot be shown to be real. They say that seeking to show them as real or not is evil, and extended all the way to the ultimate, they teach, without exception, that to test the truth is wrong and evil and that you must accept the stories instead.

To deny the view from the window, to tell people not even to look, is a hateful, wretched and evil thing, and this is why I have no respect for any faith, individual or institutionally collective.

It is a destroyer of minds and lives. I hate it and I would like to see it extirpated from the world. The real world is infinitely more beautiful and majestic and moving than any of the lies of any religion, so vastly greater than the miserable myths of ancient primitives that those "prophets" could not even begin to conceive of the greater truths they were denying. It doesn't matter if they thought they were gaining power and prestige or if they really thought they were saving some alleged magical parts of the people they ordered around.

The truth will make you free, and the only way to tell if something is true is to test it. Don't take people's word for it. Ask for the evidence. If it's real, they will happily oblige. If they don't - if they say, no, read this book, listen to this man's words, THIS is the REAL truth, this is all you need - then they are fakers and liars. It's really simple.

15 Albums

Aug. 20th, 2010 01:19 am
lproven: (Default)
In very approximately chronological order – that is, of when I discovered them, not when they came out. Ad-hoc rule: only one example of any given artist, just to add a bit of variety.

1. Age of Consent – Bronski Beat. (The first record I bought that I still love. Dangerously subversive stuff for the Isle of Man in the 1980s.)
2. Aliens Stole my Buick – Thomas Dolby. (Won on a quiz on Channel 4 and led to a life-long love of TMDR's work.)
3. Wish you were Here – Pink Floyd. (For me, *the* great Floyd album, beating Dark Side of the Moon into a cocked hat.)
4. Appetite for Destruction – Guns 'n' Roses. (The first rock'n'roll band that I really adored, and even now, every track is a winner.)
5. Get a Grip – Aerosmith. (Aerosmith later displaced GnR just for their sheer consistency. So many great records, but this stands proud as a whole, from intro to outro.)
6. Utah Saints. (Wales' finest musical hour, for me. Discovered via the Slimelight, of all things. Fair triggered my Kate Bush sensor into a floorgasm, it did.)
7. First and Last and Always – Sisters of Mercy. (The discovery of Goth. Hard to pick one Sisters album, but this was my first.)
8. Antenna – ZZ Top. (Not one of the obvious choices, but they've never made a duff record and this has one of their all-time great singles – and it isn't one of the big mid-80s ones with a video involving hot girls.)
9. The Same Sky – Horse. (Again, every track is pure gold, but “Careful” is still superbly moving.)
10. And now the legacy begins – Dream Warriors. (My first ever hip-hop album, really, and the words still shine. Deserved more fame.)
11. Garbage. (Again, they're all good, but this record blew me away in 1996.)
12. Upstairs at Eric's – Yazoo (Classic early 80s electronica and Vince Clarke at his finest, for me, but it was a tough call between this and Troublegum by Therapy?)
13. Blue Lines – Massive Attack (But I'd be equally happy to include Protection instead. And to think, when I met Nellee Hooper, I didn't know who he was...)
14. Leftism – Leftfield (Around the same time as Garbage but took longer to grow on me. Betraying a weakness for trip-hop here, aren't I?)
15. The Bends – Radiohead (Once again, tough to pick out just one, but still a towering work of staggering genius. An' that. Grew to truly value it when I realised the brilliance of Richard Cheese's cover of “Creep”.)

If this gives you any impression of my musical taste, it's probably a very skewed one. Sigur Rós is a bit too new to me to feature, for instance, and stuff like Apoptygma Berzerk and Royksopp were much-loved but relatively briefly - so far.

I'd welcome listening suggestions, though, old or new. Always looking for stuff that's new to me.
lproven: (Default)
If I have been a bit quiet on here this month, it's because someone has been paying me to write, which always makes a pleasant change. I spent last week in-house at The Register, one of the UK's top IT news sites, famed for its sarcastic irreverence.

I did mention this on The Other LJ and I've plugged each piece on Twitter and Facebook, but if you don't read such things, you can get a quick list of the articles - nine last week and one from last year - right here.

Enjoy.
lproven: (Default)
This is not one of my lists, I promise!

A friend of mine, Iain Thompson, co-wrote this piece for the American arm of what used to be VNU:
V3's top 10 science fiction writers (Handy single-long-page printable link here.)

I have no real argument with the list, myself. I am not sure Roddenbery should be on there, no matter how influential, as he wasn't really an author per se.

But it's the comments after the article which are, I think, most interesting and amusing.

For starters there are all the risible idiots who pan the piece's writers for omitting authors who actually are on the list. Perhaps they only read page 1, but if so, they're still bloody fools if they didn't spot a Top Ten list with only two entries on it. Morons, the lot of them.

But then come the comments about who should be on the list as well. Most of them don't seem to consider that there are, by definition, only 10 spots on a Top Ten list, and they want an extra half a dozen or more names add.

Some question Douglas Adams. Well, perhaps fair enough; he didn't write much, and not all of it was SF. However, for his towering influence over a generation of people and of books, I think he merits it, myself.

Jules Verne. Well, one could indeed argue that much of his output wasn't SF, either. But the SF he did write is absolutely seminal. I think he merits his inclusion.

Dick. Ah, now, Dick. I always thought PKD vastly overrated, myself. The books are frequently very confused and somewhat impenetrable. A lot of it seems to me to be the drug-addled ramblings of a deranged mind. I found them hard to read, hard to follow and generally very unrewarding.

(I'd say much the same about Kurt Vonnegut, as well, for what it's worth. Barry Malzberg wasn't much better, either.)

Bradbury: yeah, big name, but it's badly dated, trippy stuff, not hardcore SF. Almost more fantasy, or magical-realism or something, than SF. I think he is one for the wannabe literati, myself, just as Dick is. And the same goes for Delaney, Disch, Lem, Spinrad & so on: loved more by the critics and poseurs than by the readers and fans.

Crichton did write SF but was mainly known as a non-SF writer, as is Dan Simmons, so I'd argue they're thus excluded, or at least excludable.

Norton, Zelazny, even arguably Le Guin: equally known as fantasy writers (possibly even juvenile fantasy) which the writers specifically excluded - and rightly so.

OK, now, some megastars arguably did belong on there. Niven is a master, and his stuff with Pournelle is too, although I'm not sure about Jerry on his own. I liked his solo work better as a BYTE columnist.

Frank Herbert... hmmm. Tricky. I loved Dune and even really liked the sequels. Most of the rest of his stuff was fairly forgettable. I remember vague details and outlines, which is more than I can say for a lot of writers, but that's hardly a glowing recommendation. I don't think that for Dune et seq alone he counts as one of the all-time greats.

Pete Hamilton's stuff is wonderful and I love it to bits, but it's light entertainment, mostly, not a big heavy contribution to the genre. Except in terms of number of pages, anyway. I fear the same might be said of someone else I much admire, Al Reynolds.

Silverberg is wonderful, as is Anderson. Haldeman is damned good. Both did a lot of turkeys as well as golden eggs, though.

Aldiss I adore, but he might be a little specialist, I'm not sure.

Haldeman I see as workmanlike, not a megastar. I love some of the books but he's not in the pantheon for me.

Asher I covered in a previous blogpost. Morgan - only read a few, and they were great, very original, very visceral, but again, he's not yet earned a place in the all-time top 10. Stephen Baxter and Adam Roberts definitely haven't.

I could go on... but who would you folks see in the top ten, or see excluded therefrom?
lproven: (Default)
Wonderful - if very lengthy - piece from, of all places, Rolling Stone about the systematic and methodical dismantling of checks and regulations on the American financial sector, sponsored by financial fatcats, that allowed the banks to go berserk on derivatives trading and make a metric shedload of cash. The senior figures pocket the dosh and run, the banks pay no tax and then in most cases either go broke or get bailed out, and the country and its middle-classes and poor end up penniless.

Interesting that none of the old regulations have been re-instated, that the banks are handing out huge bonuses again, still not paying tax and essentially getting away with it all. Nothing has really changed.

Original article:
The Great American Bubble Machine (print view)
From tech stocks to high gas prices, Goldman Sachs has engineered every major market manipulation since the Great Depression - and they're about to do it again
By MATT TAIBBI

Pocket summary:
The Big Takeover
The global economic crisis isn't about money - it's about power. How Wall Street insiders are using the bailout to stage a revolution

And an amusing rogues' gallery of the chief culprits:
The Dirty Dozen
Meet the bankers and brokers responsible for the financial crisis - and the officials who let them get away with it

Video links, which don't work for me but might if you're in the USA...
Inside The Great American Bubble Machine
Matt Taibbi on how Goldman Sachs has engineered every major market manipulation since the Great Depression

As this last says:
The piece has generated controversy, with Goldman Sachs firing back that Taibbi's piece is "an hysterical compilation of conspiracy theories" and a spokesman adding, "We reject the assertion that we are inflators of bubbles and profiteers in busts, and we are painfully conscious of the importance in being a force for good." Taibbi shot back: "Goldman has its alumni pushing its views from the pulpit of the U.S. Treasury, the NYSE, the World Bank, and numerous other important posts; it also has former players fronting major TV shows. They have the ear of the president if they want it."
P.S.
Futher recommended viewing: Overstock's Patrick Byrne on the corruption within Wall Street.
80min long presentation, but it's worth it.
lproven: (Default)
Just had to dig this out for a mate of mine and thought I'd share it.

One of my favourite webcomics from what were (for me) the early days, around 2000-2002.

Flem Comics: the site that brought you the immortal Hank, The Dancing Abortion.

Specifically, Flem on Mormon-hunting:


(From http://www.flemcomics.com/d/20020108.html)
Read more... )
lproven: (Default)
New York Times: Is it true that Buzz Lightyear, the cartoon astronaut, was named after you?
Buzz Aldrin: Apparently, but there’s no evidence in my bank account to substantiate that.

From Questions for Buzz Aldrin - The Man on the Moon - By DEBORAH SOLOMON
lproven: (Default)
How I Met My Wife

It had been a rough day, so when I walked into the party I was very chalant, despite my efforts to appear gruntled and consolate. I was furling my wieldy umbrella for the coat check when I saw her standing alone in a corner. She was a descript person, a woman in a state of total array. Her hair was kempt, her clothing shevelled, and she moved in a gainly way. I wanted desperately to meet her, but I knew I'd have to make bones about it, since I was travelling cognito. Beknownst to me, the hostess, whom I could see both hide and hair of, was very proper, so it would be skin off my nose if anything bad happened. And even though I had only swerving loyalty to her, my manners couldn't be peccable. Only toward and heard-of behavior would do. Fortunately, the embarrassment that my maculate appearance might cause was evitable. There were two ways about it, but the chances that someone as flappable as I would be ept enough to become persona grata or sung hero were slim. I was, after all, something to sneeze at, someone you could easily hold a candle to, someone who usually aroused bridled passion. So I decided not to rush it. But then, all at once, for some apparent reason, she looked in my direction and smiled in a way that I could make heads or tails of. So, after a terminable delay, I acted with mitigated gall and made my way through the ruly crowd with strong givings. Nevertheless, since this was all new hat to me and I had no time to prepare a promptu speech, I was petuous. She responded well, and I was mayed that she considered me a savory char- acter who was up to some good. She told me who she was. "What a perfect nomer," I said, advertently. The conversation became more and more choate, and we spoke at length to much avail. But I was defatigable, so I had to leave at a godly hour. I asked if she wanted to come with me. To my delight, she was committal. We left the party together and have been together ever since. I have given her my love, and she has requited it.

- Jack Winter, Shouts & Murmurs




A Very Descript Man

I am such a dolent man,
I eptly work each day;
My acts are all becilic,
I've just ane things to say.

My nerves are strung, my hair is kempt,
I'm gusting and I'm span:
I look with dain on everyone
And am a pudent man.

I travel cognito and make
A delible impression:
I overcome a slight chalance,
With gruntled self-possession.

My dignation would be great
If I should digent be:
I trust my vagance will bring
An astrous life for me.

- J H Parker




Both from the A Word A Day newsletter
lproven: (Default)
Couple of bits of particularly bad news that I have come across this week.

[1] M.I.T. joins climate realists, doubles its projection of global warming by 2100 to 5.1°C

Well worth reading the piece and the links thence.

In summary, if very serious action is not taken - big league stuff, not fooling around with pointless nonsense like off-setting and biofuels - then we're on line for a warming of up to seven centigrade by the end of the century. One of the problems with these reports, as one of the linked articles discusses, is that [a] people don't understand probability and [b] climate scientists cannot believe how very stupid people are, so the scientists phrase their reports in their normal cautious language: "temperatures may increase, maybe by this much but more likely by only this much, if emissions are not reduced..." Partly because they can't credit that nobody will do anything.

Personally, I'm a cynic; I don't believe anyone will do anything significant.

Reasons the figures are being adjusted are, for instance, that the oceans are not absorbing much CO2 any more - because they've been doing it as fast as they can for a couple of centuries already and now they are near saturated, so much so that large areas are now largely dead and devoid of multicellular life.

Also, whereas the report does address discoveries such as the failing rates of uptake by the biosphere, it does not consider major new threats, such as massive methane (and carbon dioxide) release from thawing permafrost (did you know that a quarter the Northern hemisphere is permafrost?) and melting seabed methane clathrates.

And these are all synergies - they reinforce one another. In other words, the MIT report is far too cautious in its predictions.

[2] Meanwhile, in Central Asia, Lake Balhkash is in imminent danger of drying up. Now that the Aral Sea is effectively gone - the biggest single man-made environmental disaster in the world, certainly in the 20th Century and possibly, arguably, of the industrial revolution so far, and I bet most people have never even heard of it - Balkhash is the largest body of water in Central Asia after the Caspian. However, unlike the seas, it's shallow: only 5m to 25m deep. But now, it's getting polluted and also starved of water - it's just not showing that much yet, because it's getting topped-up by all the melting glaciers.

OK, so, it's far away and won't impact Britain much, but that, in my book, is no reason to not care. These are the early-stage big obvious signs of the looming catastrophe.

[3] Japan's boffins: Global warming isn't man-made; Climate science is 'ancient astrology', claims report

Several leading Japanese scientists have spoken out against anthropogenic climate change. This is terrifying stuff - while Japan is a highly insular culture, it is also an influential one. And one with a terrible record in terms of environmental responsibility, from whaling to massive timber use. I cannot help but wonder who has bought these guys off.

This will give more fuel to the global-warming deniers, and so long as they are around and voting, they will doom us all, and our children and our childrens' children. After that, well, at this rate, all bets are off. Plastic-laminated picture books on how to chip stone tools, make bows and arrows and effective ways to hunt, prepare and eat rats and cockroaches might be the best gift for the great-grandkids, I reckon.

Not A Rhetorical Question: what would make people believe, short of actually seeing it themselves? Because by the time the figures are in, it will be too late to change anything significant.

My bet: we are on course for an ice-free world within a century or two. Synergistic effects will accelerate massively, the polar caps and glaciers all melt, sea levels rise by 70m (200') and the inundated coasts, melting permafrost and clathrates and CO2 saturation of the oceans kills off most marine species leaving huge dead zones. There will be rapid mass human die-offs on land, due to agricultural collapse and scarcity of fresh water. Rivers will dry up as the snows and glaciers feeding them disappear and the tree cover on high watersheds is cut down and burned, leading to flooding, soil loss and rapid desertification. There will be epic water wars. All this long before the fossil fuels run out.

It is almost funny. We are all in a bus, careening down a steep mountain road at ever-increasing speed, completely out of control, but lots of passengers think this is normal and are saying they're looking forward to getting to the bottom and the drivers are still arguing whether to brake or not.

I wonder when people will notice? I wonder if I will live to see it? I hope to make it to 2050 or so. By then, I reckon, we will have made only token efforts and it will be irreversible.
lproven: (Default)
Not Always Right

A brief example:

Me: “**** Library, how can I help you?”

Caller: “Yes, I have some books that are due tomorrow, but I need to keep them longer.”

Me: “Okay, ma’am. I’ll need your name so I can renew the books.”

Caller: *scandalized* “You need my what?”

Me: “Your name, ma’am. So I can call up your account on my computer.”

Caller: “You have my account?! How did you get that? Do you have my Social Security number?”

Me: “No, ma’am. I mean your library account. When you came in to get your library card, you filled out a form with your name, address, phone number, and email, so that we can contact you if you ever have overdue books. We don’t have your social security number.”

Caller: “Well, I’m not giving out my name to a complete stranger over the phone!”

Me: “Okay, ma’am. Perhaps you could give me the titles of the books?”

Caller: “Why do you need to know what I’m reading?! The books are due tomorrow! Just renew them!”

Me: “I’m sorry, ma’am, but there’s no way I can look up books by the due date. Without your name or the titles of the books, I can’t help you.”

Caller: “You’re trying to steal my identity! I’m calling the cops.”

Me: *giving up* “You do that, ma’am.” *hangs up*

Co-worker: “You should have told her we put cameras in the books.”
lproven: (Default)
TOP SEKRIT scientology tape exposed!

This is even loonier than the that stuff about some cosmic Jewish zombie can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh, drink his blood, and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master so he can remove an evil force present in all humanity because some rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree. (I know, I've used that one before, but I still like it. I did read a version similarly précising islam but I can't find it.)
lproven: (Default)
You have two cows.

John Paulson borrows one cow so he can sell it for $100. He gives you $10 as collateral.

You buy your neighbors cow for $100, which you finance by taking out a $90 loan from the bank and use John's $10 to make up the rest.

You brag to everyone about your financial health. You have assets--two cows you own, plus one Paulson owes you--worth $300, and liabilities of just $100.

A third of the country goes vegetarian.

You thought your two cows were worth $200 and now they are worth $140.

You express confidence in your financial health. Your assets are now worth only $200--your two cows plus the one John owes you--but your liabilities are still only $100. If necessary, you could sell the assets at this distressed price and pay off all your loans.

You hold onto your cows because you are sure the market is "dislocated." Some day someone will want to eat beef again.

The rest of the country goes vegetarian. Your two cows are now worth $2 each to guys who want to make dog food.

John Paulson buys a cow in the market for $2 and he gives it to you as repayment of the loan. You now have three cows worth six bucks.

John wants his $10 back.

The bank calls. It wants its $90 back.

You call the Federal Reserve and ask for a bailout.

Nicked from here.
lproven: (Default)
OneSentence

True stories, told in one sentence.

This site is just so full of win. A few examples:

-----

When I told him I wouldn't have sex with him in the back of his car, he replied, "But it's an Audi."

-----

You know work is exciting when in the same week you can say, "I got attacked by an angry black midget" and "I was bitten by a lesbian stripper."

-----

She ended our three-and-a-half year relationship on New Year's Day by telling me she never loved me, so I took back the engagement ring I had been carrying in my pocket and used the money to by a 55-inch plasma television.

-----

The hardest part was explaining why my black eye just so happened to look like a chicken's foot.

-----

I never knew how much he loved me until he showed me the pictures of us he kept in his Army helmet for 4 years.

-----

One of the joys of sleepwalking is spending my morning speculating what happened last night to cause me to wake up holding a teaspoon.

-----

"And of course you've made recent backups", he said sarcastically.

-----

After I tricked my little brother into eating a Jalapeno pepper for the first time, I told him eating another one would cancel out the spiciness of the first.

-----

I met an anaesthesiologist last year who confessed after several drinks that she sometimes pops the pimples of her patients while they are asleep so that they will look better when they wake up.
lproven: (Default)
Read from the bottom upwards...

Graham Linehan (Glinner)
By 'pick up', I mean 'collect'.
about 2 hours ago from TweetDeck

Jon Ronson (jonronson)
Got picked up. Was grumpy. Feel contrite.
about 2 hours ago from mobile web

Graham Linehan (Glinner)
Right, off to pick up a frazzled, partied-out three year old.
about 2 hours ago from TweetDeck
lproven: (Default)
Just before I head off to the X Electrical Jule party, a little note of gloom and despair to enliven this winter evening.

Too late? Why scientists say we should expect the worst
The cream of the UK climate science community sat in stunned silence as Anderson pointed out that carbon emissions since 2000 have risen much faster than anyone thought possible, driven mainly by the coal-fuelled economic boom in the developing world. So much extra pollution is being pumped out, he said, that most of the climate targets debated by politicians and campaigners are fanciful at best, and "dangerously misguided" at worst.
And on the other, very much less probable side...

Wind, water and sun beat other energy alternatives, study finds

Summary: for the US, given a national grid, wind power could work, especially supplemented with other renewables. They don't favour nuclear basically because of the risk of weapons. And check out their metric for the "carbon footprint" of nuclear power: estimating the CO2 release from bombs!

Profile

lproven: (Default)
Liam Proven

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 25th, 2026 05:04 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios