lproven: (Default)
A long time ago, a man decided to take a chance and moved abroad for a new job.

Not me, although I did that too, last year.

No, this was my dad, Ian Proven, in about 1972 or so. He went to Lagos in Nigeria to take over Pilkington Glass (Nigeria) Ltd. It went very well -- he diversified from plate glass into glass fibre, ideal for boat hulls in the tropics, both because it doesn't rot and because it can easily be made and repaired by unskilled people, even illiterate ones, working from purely pictorial instructions. But the stress destroyed his fragile health, and in about 1976 we came back to Britain.

He recovered, and in 1977 or so, we went back, this time to work for a different company, Leventis. This is a Lebanese Cypriot-owned chain of supermarkets in West Africa, who decided to get into glass bottle making. (Soft drinks are a very big seller in the tropics.) My dad was about the 8th general manager they hired. He went out to a large hole in the ground, and when we left in about 1980, Delta Glass' plant was producing a million bottles a week. I still have a few.

But this job was far upcountry, in Bendel State, deep in the Niger Delta. Initially we lived in a small town called Warri-Effurun, at first in the Gardenia Hotel and later in a chalet in Chief Essiso's compound. Then we moved closer to the factory, to the village of Ughelli. I think we were the first white people ever to live there -- we caused a lot of interest and attention.

But it meant that I was something of a lonely child, studying at home by correspondence course, socialising almost entirely with adults. My dad had already got me reading SF, giving me his old Heinleins and Asimovs and Van Vogts. Indeed I already disdained fantasy; one of my set books from Mercer's College was The Hobbit and I remember exclaiming in horror at having to read a book with a dragon on the cover.

But SF, I devoured, in great quantities. An adult novel every couple of days, at least. Anything I could get. Everything SF&F in the Warri Club's tiny library, including lots I really disliked -- Philip K Dick, Barry Malzberg, Brian Stableford (in his enfant terrible years -- the later stuff is wonderful).

But I also bought a lot, or got my mum to. Anything SFnal that appeared in the supermarkets we went to in Warri -- Kingsway and Alex, mainly. And in the book rack in Alex one day, I found something that looked very promising. A slender NEL paperback with a beautiful Tim White cover of a robot fly, resting on a leaf.

It was called The Dark Side of the Sun by a new writer called Terry Pratchett, and it was -- and is -- one of the best books I have ever read. In parts it's an hommage to Larry Niven, but it's so packed full of references to everything from Aristophanes to Heinlein that it's a joy to try to unpack.

I loved it. I still love it.

I had it stolen once, but as it happened, I got it back again.

A couple of years later, the Proven family returned to UK, and shortly afterwards, to the Isle of Man. There, in another book rack in another supermarket, Shoprite on Victoria Road, Douglas, I found another Pratchett: Strata. This is the novel where Pratchett invents his flat alternate Earth, a world the shape of a disc, populated by a vaguely Mediæval culture with magic, demons etc. -- but all powered by technology. Demons fly because they're constantly teleported back to base and then back out again, this time slightly higher in the air, because there's no such thing as antigravity and a humanoid with wings can't fly in 1G.

Again, a wonderful book. Any sufficiently advanced technology can be made to look indistinguishable from magic if you try hard enough. This book also spells out panspermia, has one of the best depictions of large-scale terraforming ever and works in some great conspiracy-theory gags too.

I wrote to NEL and asked if they'd got any more by this fabulous writer (and also if they'd got any stuff for a school project on SF that I was doing). An actual paper letter -- this was the early 1980s. They wrote back. They said, in essence, "sorry, no -- and those two did so badly, we'll never touch him again. But, if you're really keen, he did a kids' book which was not our sort of thing. It never made it out of hardback. We believe his publisher has rather a lot of them left. Here's his address. Ask him."

So I did.

A year or two later, when I was off at university, in my second year and living in digs in Virginia Water, I got a phone call from a chap with an immensely rich, plummy, posh English voice.

"Hullo! Are you Liam Proven? You wrote me a lovely little letter about books by this Terry Pratchett chap! Yes, I have hundreds of the bloody things -- office is full of boxes of 'em. Can't give 'em away! How many d'you want?"

It was Colin Smythe -- a charming chap I met at the launch party for Hogfather, the twentieth Discworld book, a decade or so later.

And that is how I came by my third -- but oldest -- Terry Pratchett novel. This copy here, scanned the day I rediscovered it:

TCP-2

It is now, of course, far and away the most valuable book I own or have ever owned. Rare unsigned copy, too. And I do mean rare.

Before it got to me, The Colour of Magic launched -- from Corgi this time -- and the rest is history. A few years later, I was at ConFiction in the Hague. Pterry was on a panel about clichés. I think Sourcery had just come out in paperback. People in the business were starting to really notice him. He was introduced as "Terry Pratchett, a man who should know all about clichés because that's all he writes!" Pratchett visibily ground his teeth, but as ever, gave a good show.

So, yes, dammit, I was a Pratchett fan, and one long before all these damned kids and their Discworld stuff. (Much as I love the Discworld novels.)  But I wonder how many others of us are there who were Pratchett fans from before the Discworld? Of his original, early SF stuff.

Goodbye, Sir Terry.
lproven: (Default)
I've been trying to think what I have reread the most times.

I am not 100% sure -- I don't keep records -- but it's probably something like (& I'm bundling sequels in here):

[1] The Hitch-hiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams
[2] The Dark Side of the Sun, Terry Pratchett
[3] Strata, Pratchett
[4] The Colour of Magic, Pratchett
[5] Red / Green / Blue Mars, Kim Stanley Robinson (would be higher but for their length)
[6] Chaga, Ian McDonald
[7] Good Omens, Neil Gaiman & Pratchett
[8] Blood Sucking Fiends, Christopher Moore
[9] Riotous Assembly, Tom Sharpe
[10] Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, Robert Pirsig
lproven: (Default)
It's time for my every-few-years reread of Stan Robinson's masterwork, and lo, there is a Reddit thread about it. It's full of people whining that it's too long and they couldn't finish it.

I may have got a bit carried away in my reply...

- - - - -

Having RTTEOTT, I am *appalled* by the amount of negative comments. As it happens, a few days ago, I started rereading the trilogy. I reread them every few years and have done since they came out. This will be my 5th or 6th time through - I lose count. I downloaded ebooks of them because my original paperbacks are starting to become tattered and frayed from all the rereadings.

Every time, they are fresh and new. Every time, I discover new things in them. Many of the characters feel like personal friends now, from Sax Russel, Nadia Chernyshevski, Arkady Bodganov, Nirgal and Michel Duval; or people that I might not get on with, but know well, such as Anne Clayborne; or people I might dislike but admire for their work, like John Boone and Frank Chalmers; or people I think I would dislike or just couldn't deal with, such as Maya Toitovna or Phyllis Boyle.

I almost feel like I know Underhill and Burroughs and Echus Overlook and Sheffield. It feels like I've been there. It feels like *I've* driven through Noctis Labyrinthus into Marineris, gone down into Hellas and Argyre, driven a rover up Olympus to crater Pt or gazed at the great marching barchan dunes of the vastitas borealis. When I study maps of Mars, I look at it in terms of the places I know - Elysium, Cairo, Vishniac, Low Point. I always come away disappointed that they are not there.

The only stuff I've reread more than R/G/B Mars is Douglas Adams and some early Terry Pratchett (notably the pre-Discworld SF).

R/G/B Mars is possibly *the* defining SF masterpiece of the 1990s - an era which also saw the bulk of Iain M Banks' SF work, saw the début of Ken Macleod, arguably the finest works of Ian McDonald and many other truly great works.

They are perhaps not the most accessible novels. They are long and dense. I wish I could believe that the 3 redditors who called it "dry" were punning on Mars' aridity but I don't think they were.

It's also one of the best-structured trilogies I've ever read. The colours set the themes: the first book is about technology, about learning to live on the red planet, building to a crescendo of suffering, pain and destruction.

The second book is about bringing the planet to life, about the turmoil and torment and damage and disruption that this would inevitably cause, about the revolutions and the struggle for independence.

But then, when you've done that, when you've explored Mars from pole to pole, made it real, filled it with people drawn in such detail that I could pick them out of an identity parade, and then painted it: thawed it, filled it with life, embodied Hiroko Ai's /viriditas/ and performed the great ecopoesis and brought the Red Planet to life, gone through the areophany, then where?

And that is the triumphant conclusion: because whereas Red to Green is the obvious step, it's what a hundred SF writers have done before, Stan Robinson comes up with the astonishing hat trick. When Mars is alive, a living world, when Sax' great dream has come true, then what?

Well, it's a world. It's a whole planet, and even when it has seas and an ocean - and a canal at last, of course, Schiaparelli and more to the point Lowell vindicated at last! - /then/ Robinson comes back and asks: OK. What now? This is not a bit of set-dressing. This is a world, a planet, filled with millions of people. It has factions, it has parties, it has politics. Book 1 has interpersonal dynamics, and what readers still in their 20s might not realise yet, it has the pacing of real life. You look away and suddenly a decade has passed and the whole world has changed around you. People die. People make mistakes, they fuck up, and they get back up and they go on. So /yes/ the story jumps but life jumps like that too once you're not a kid any more.

Book 2 is about growth.

And then comes Blue Mars. OK, so, they did it, it's alive now. So what?

Well, so what is that now, Mars has to mature, like a person: it has to break away from its parent, leave home. It has to shake off the shackles of UNOMA and UNTA and stand alone, be its own place. And that means a government, a constitution, a system of politics.

I hate politics. You know how you can tell when a politician is lying? Their lips move.

But it's a necessary evil. If you have lots of people, you need to have it. It happens, like death. It is part of the group dynamics of being human beings. And Book 3 doesn't shy away from that, it rubs your face in it and it makes you care. The great conference in Dorsa Brevia is the best-written political scene that SF has ever had, and I daresay, that literature has ever had. It is dull, it goes on too long, but that is *real*, that is how it is, it is representational. And it is made real, with Art Randolph running around trying to record it all and Nadia reluctantly taking on the /really/ big construction job of her life, that of making a world into a nation, a state, a land.

And the wonderful conclusion - the round-Mars runners, the swimmers, the sailboats, *sailboats!* On the *ocean* on *Mars*! /Nobody/ has ever had the guts to do that, but Stan Robinson did.

Screw Bradbury and his Chronicles, dull spacey hippy druggie stuff that they were. Bugger Burroughs and his red-skinned big-boobed princesses. I'm sorry, but even the great Ian McDonald and his /Desolation Road/ with its Astounding Tatterdemalion Air Bazaar don't compare to this. They are mere vignettes, snapshots. Robinson paints the big picture, the birth of a whole world, the biggest picture it is possible to see, and he paints it warts and all and it's beautiful.

It is, overall, the most astoundingly beautiful book I have ever read, or, I think, that I ever will read. Many have moved me, from /Eon/ to /Ringworld/, or what-might-have-beens such as /The Difference Engine/, or excited me such as /Snow Crash/ or /The Diamond Age, or, a Young Lady's Illustrated Primer./

But they are all small things indeed next to the sweep, the majesty, the awe, of Mars and the great areophany.

And I understand that many people don't get it. But that's OK. Some people just are poor sad crippled little souls, unable to appreciate beauty and great art. That's how life is. It's OK, there are lots of good books with rayguns and rocket ships in for them.
lproven: (Default)
I went and picked up my new bike today. It's an Optima Condor, a long-distance trekking recumbent. I was lucky enough to win it on eBay a month ago, but it's taken a while to find the money and the time to go and collect it. I even managed to ride the thing home from Marylebone Station to Mitcham, which is one hell of a first ride on a new and unfamiliar bike - right through central London, in the dark on wet roads.

As I reorganized the garage and put it away, something suddenly occurred to me which I'd not previously thought of. My new steed shared a name with one of the most famous bicycles in travel writing - the faithful ride of my personal heroine, Anne Mustoe. Mustoe cycled round the world twice on her Condor mixte tourer - one westwards, and then nearly a decade later, heading eastwards. She also followed the Silk Road, the American pioneer trail, the Roman amber route, Hanuman's route from Nepal across India to Sri Lanka from the Ramayana, the Way of St James from Le Puy-en-Velay to Santiago de Compostela and any number of other epic rides, and wrote about them all with a wonderful dry wit and lavish attention to detail and history. I finished her account of a journey across Latin America, Che Guevara and the Mountain of Silver: By Bicycle and Train Through South America, on the train up towards Banbury this afternoon.

She called her bike "Condor" as it was made by that fine bike manufacturer. Mine is a Condor too, but that's its model name - it was made by Optima in the Netherlands.

Thinking to mention this, I went to Mustoe's site, only to find it squatted by a commercial page. I wondered what had happened and Googled her - only to find a swath of obituaries, from the Times, the Telegraph and other cycling luminaries.

I'm dismayed. I had really hoped to meet her some time, or listen to her speak. She rode around the world the first time, alone, at 54, not having ridden a bike in 30 years. She hated camping, freely admitted she could not fix a puncture, and didn't carry lights as she disliked riding at night. She wasn't keen on the countryside, either, describing herself as a "city mouse". I started reading her books last year and loved them.

I am terribly saddened to learn of her death, which happened late last year in Syria as she was cycling to Singapore - on her own, of course, on Condor, at 76 years of age.

She was one of my greatest inspirations and I can only hope to follow in her wheel-tracks some time. I hope my Condor can take me to some of the places hers did.

I recommend her books to all of you, especially the wonderfully-modestly titled A Bike Ride.
lproven: (Default)
OK, so, not very popular request... Count 'em on the fingers of one foot, probably. But wotthehell, archie, wotthehell. I have been asked what was worth reading recently, so here are my favourites of the new SF I've read in the two-thousand-and-noughties.

This is just the top 10, and it's from my ever-more-fallible memory. I fear there may well be some stellar stuff I've completely overlooked, and if so, I humbly apologise.

1. The Algebraist – Iain M Banks

What can you say about Banksie? The man actually genuinely is a genius – one of the greatest men of English letters in many decades, I feel. As well as mind-stretching settings and burning originality, beautiful prose and memorable characters, both sympathetic and not, he also has the trick of making it all look effortless. Stunning stuff. I love the earlier Culture books, but feel he has gone somewhat off the boil in more recent years, as if getting bored with the world he build. Thus a departure into a completely fresh, new one is very welcome. It's not a return to form – he's never lost his form – but it's fresher than anything since, or including, Excession.
Read more... )
lproven: (Default)
At the Egyptian city of Naucratis, there was a famous old god, whose name was Theuth... and he was the inventor of many arts, such as arithmetic and calculation and geometry and astronomy and draughts and dice, but his great discovery was the use of letters.

In those days, the god Thamus was the king of the whole country.

To him came Theuth and showed his inventions, desiring that the other Egyptians might be allowed to have the benefit of them; he enumerated them, and Thamus enquired about their several uses, and praised some of them and censured others, as he approved or disapproved of them.

It would take a long time to repeat all that Thamus said to Theuth in praise or blame of the various arts.

But when they came to letters, "This," said Theuth, "will make the Egyptians wiser and give them better memories; it is a specific both for the memory and for the wit."

Thamus replied: "O most ingenious Theuth, the parent or inventor of an art is not always the best judge of the utility or inutility of his own inventions to the users of them. And in this instance, you who are the father of letters, from a paternal love of your own children have been led to attribute to them a quality which they cannot have; for this discovery of yours will create forgetfulness in the learners' souls, because they will not use their memories; they will trust to the external written characters and not remember of themselves."

- Plato, "Phaedrus"

Bottom Ten

Jan. 13th, 2010 04:15 pm
lproven: (Default)
Everyone posts "top 10" or "top 5" lists in blogs and things. It's an easy enough bit of filler & it can provoke some discussion, or give people ideas of stuff they might like.

But it's low-hanging fruit. So I thought I'd try something a bit different: a bottom ten.

In no particular order – at least so far – here are ten novels I really wish that I'd never read. A nice trip to the dentist would have been more fun and more rewarding. All of them came highly recommended by someone, as far as I can recall, and some by lots of people.

1. Little, Big – John Crowley. A dreadfully tedious modern fairytale, where every time the author managed to arouse some small degree of interest in a character, he promptly shifted the timeline of the narrative a few decades forward, so they became an old person pottering around in the background. It took me nine months to struggle through this and I read dozens of other, more enjoyable books in between; every few chapters, I couldn't face any more, so went and read something fun instead. Came with about six pages of plaudits in the front: a warning sign. The only one that was accurate was (I think) Katharine Kurtz, who marvelled at it as a tightrope act, never quite tumbling into Twee. It's true, but at least a bit of twee is fun sometimes. Gaiman can warm your heart this way if he pleases, for instance.

2. Light – M John Harrison. I've met Mike Harrison, briefly. He is a charming, witty and very cool chap. His prose, too, is witty and stylish. The trouble is, that is all there is to it; it's hollow, there are no interesting or sympathetic characters, no real story, no interesting settings or scenery or ideas or anything. Nothing to give a damn about. I really disliked the Viriconium stories, way back when, but this was meant to be a triumphant return and proper space opera. It's neither.

3. Appleseed – John Clute. I am not an admirer of Mr Clute's criticism, which I find impenetrable, a morass of obscure verbiage and pretentiousness. The purpose of writing, I feel, is to communicate, and Clute is very very bad at this. But I thought it would be interesting to see what he produced when writing fiction instead. I wish I hadn't. It's dull, uneventful, its meaning as ever hidden behind a chiaroscuro of lexicographical pyrotechnics; I was unable to muster any interest in any part of the story or its cast, and the attempt at an impressive Big (possibly-)Dumb Object wasn't. I should have heeded the warning sign in the front of this one, too: a definition of a couple of the really obscure words. I think "azelujaria" was one. I'd rather Sonnets from the Portuguese than vocabulary from it, thanks.

(Aside: the good Appleseed is the one by Masamune Shirow, which I highly recommend.)

4. Vast – Linda Nagata. Strange semi-mystical saga in a big weird alien spaceship. Feels like waking from an anæsthetic, when you're all groggy, nothing makes sense and you can't quite think straight no matter how hard you try. Nothing in the book ever comes clear – it's all weird and spacey and floaty without managing the leap into the mythical or mystical. Immensely frustrating.

5. The Aleutian Trilogy – Gwyneth Jones (counting as one). I have said terrible things about Ms Jones' books, writing intemperately and badly in a mate's blog. Alas, I got quoted. Misery and infamy and shame. I should have tried much harder to express what I didn't like, but I find it very hard to do so. I dislike the biologically-nonsensical, implausible alien biology; if one can't do this convincingly, don't do it, don't just witter. I disliked the aliens too, a bunch of whiny mopey emo-kid ingenues with the power of gods. Despicable. I was irritated that they appear so human-like for no good reason I could discern other than making them interact better with humans. I found the story and actions and characters all hateful. Settings were well-placed, but the stuff I'd find interesting was off in the background, and in the foreground was hundreds of pages of moping. Gah.

6. Climbing Olympus – Kevin J Anderson. A recommendation from a friend and I shall never forgive him. “Anderson is good when he's writing his own original stuff,” he protested. NO. HE. ISN'T. This book was absolutely unutterable crap from beginning to end with added bad-horror-writer nasty bits thrown in.

7. The Garbage Chronicles – Brian Herbert. Never was a book more aptly titled. Elder son of the sainted Frank of that ilk, Herbert Jr can only have got published because of the family connections. He couldn't write his way out of a wet paper bag. Unspeakably dreadful. The only way this guy could write any worse was paired up with some other talentless hack... Oh, wait...

8. White Mars – Roger Penrose & Brian Aldiss. I adore most of Aldiss' work; he was the first big-name writer I ever met at a convention and he - and also his late wife, who introduced me to him – are absolutely lovely, charming people. Penrose is more famous for The Emperor's New Mind, which is waiting in my epic to-be-read pile. (I blame Bookmooch.) I already know I don't agree with its central concept, though. But I got the book new, from and signed for me by Brian himself. So I hated myself for hating it, but I found it trite, implausible, contrived and awkward as hell. A massive disappointment.

9. Artemis Fowl & Artemis Fowl: The Arctic Incident - Eoin Colfer. When I heard that Mr Colfer had got the contract to write a sequel to the Hitch-hikers' Guide to the Galaxy books, I was deeply concerned, so I decided to sample his earlier stuff. (Even though I dislike juveniles as a rule and did even when I was a kid.) I was right to be afraid. I really really Did Not Get On with these books. Apart from the irritating protagonist and his clichéd accomplices, I found the whole thing stereotypical and dull. But worst of all, Colfer tries to write magic in a sciency, science-fictiony sort of way, and he can't do it. It's as bad as that awful line about “doing the Kessel run in less than six parsecs”, betraying utter illiteracy in the terms or the vocabulary – Colfer does not understand the language of science at all, so he tries to ape it and fails very badly. Hugely irritating, utterly without interest or any redeeming features.

10. Mortal Mask – Steven Marley. A kind gift when in hospital, from a long-ago girlfriend, who said she loved these books and thought I might. I'm afraid not. I found this first one immensely irritating with its not-very-well-done incomprehensible Chinese mythology and its directionless plot centred around an utterly-unsympathetic lead character who I just wanted to meet an end. Preferably nasty and very soon. Tedious and uninspiring.


Honourable mentions

In more recent years, I've largely stopped trying to finish books that I am really seriously disliking, so there are a whole bunch that I just gave up on. As such, I can't really pass judgement. I might go back for another crack at them some day, but for now – meh.

1. The Third Policeman – Flann O'Brien. Started out fun then just became random.

2. City of the Iron Fish – Simon Ings. Started because I'd enjoyed Headlong so much, ironically.

3. The Night Mayor – Jack Yeovil. Like the (real) author, like his short fiction and journalism, but I could not wade through the mass of reference upon reference in this. It's no fun if you can't get them, so it is an error, I feel, to rely upon them totally.

4. Bold as Love – Gwyneth Jones. Its praises were sung at me but I wouldn't buy it so a friend gave it to me. Dear gods, as if there weren't enough tree-huggers and stereotypes in the world already. Ack.

5. The Far Side of the World – Patrick O'Brian. Failed at about page 3, a good half a dozen times. Mind you, it's worse than that sounds – I am not sure I've made it into the second actual sentence yet.

6. Dying of the Light – George R R Martin. I really love a lot of this chap's work, but he is astonishingly diverse and I just could not get into this book.

7. And Another Thing – Eoin Colfer. As a serious Douglas Adams fan, I feared the worst of an authorised sequel. I had been far, far too optimistic.

8. Canal Dreams – Iain Banks. I adore his SF, but his mainstream stuff leaves me cold. This one, on the other hand, left me stricken. Both dull and rather unpleasant, which is a neat trick in an awful sort of way.

9. Fear & Loathing on the Campaign Trail – Hunter S Thompson. OK, so, not technically a novel, but still. I much enjoyed Hells Angels and his shorter writing, but I neither know nor care about US politics, especially not that occurring before I was 5. Grindingly dull, yet bafflingly fêted; I don't get the book or the response to the book.

10. Illuminatus! - Robert Shea & Robert Anson Wilson. The really weird thing is, I love this book, but every one of the two or three times I read it, by half- to three-quarters of the way through the third volume, I just can't take any more and give up. Very strange. One day I will get there and I am sure it'll all be worth it.

Bad news

Jan. 6th, 2009 10:43 pm
lproven: (Default)
Murder One is to close.

Done to death by the lying b*st*rd landlords who told them that the building was being demolished and kicked them out. Of course, it's not, it's still going strong, with some new businesses in there. It's one of the newer buildings in the area; I always found the "news" unlikely.

To be honest, I'd not been in the new place. I was a regular in the old one, because of its huge, excellent SF section - but that had to be dropped in the new place, for lack of room.

I can't help but wonder if these two facts are connected.

No SF => less business => closure...?

Damned sad news, anyway. The Book Inn went years ago, after their fire; uninsured, I believe. Now Murder One. Where else is there apart from Fantasy Centre and Forbidden Planet?

Ironically, I heard the news from FP's very own [livejournal.com profile] danacea.
lproven: (Default)
There is, after an interval of far too many years, a new book out by one of my favourite writers, Greg Egan. It's called Incandescence. You can read more about it there - there's even a YouTube trailer, which I'm unable to see here at the office.

Well worth knowing in addition to this is that Egan has put an earlier short story set in the same universe online on his site for free. And it's bloody good, too. (If you like this sort of thing, which I personally do, very much. Egan's written more of my favourite short stories than any other single writer, and his novels are blinding too.)

It is called "Riding the Crocodile" and it is well worth an hour or so of your attention. (I devoured it in rather a lot less, myself.)

As for the book, I don't know yet. I'm waiting for the standard-size paperback; I obscurely resent paying a fiver or so extra for a slightly bigger P/B printed up from the hardback page layouts. Thus I am resisting, with some effort, buying Incandescence just yet.

I'm currently on a Kim Stanley Robinson jag. I've reread RGB Mars more times than I can remember now, including in the last year. I've just finished rereading the whole Three Californias set, for the first time since I got all three, and am currently happily immersed in Escape from Kathmandu, which I've only previously read partially - its four component novellas were published individually in Asimov's (or Analog, I forget) something like 20y ago, before I subscribed, and I enjoyed them immensely back then. Must find a copy of Antarctica and the remaining anthologies now. And I do mean "now".

(I also really must re-subscribe to Analog & Asimov's. They deserve our support. I let them go, with extreme reluctance, during an economy drive a few years ago.)
lproven: (Default)
I recently saw a rather fun little web page which took various passages from books and replaced all works describing colour with a small block of the colour itself; the object was to try to work out the hue described. You could click on the swatch to see if you were right. (Alas, I can't find the link. Sorry.)

Mostly, though, I was pleased to see that the source of one of the quotes was Green Mars by Kim Stanley Robinson, [part of] one of my all-time favourite novels.

Shortly afterwards, I decided to re-read last year's Stan Robinson epic, the Science in the Capital trilogy. Monday and Tuesday it was Forty Signs of Rain, a much-appreciated birthday gift from [livejournal.com profile] fishlifter last year; yesterday and today, it's Fifty Degrees Below.

(Aside: I understand that to make the title work, he has to use Fahrenheit in the title at least, but I wish there was a conversion chart or footnotes or something giving Celsius. He did in the Mars books. Fahrenheit means absolutely nothing to me; it was obsolete before I knew what "temperature" meant, the most useless and dated of the not-at-all-missed Imperial units. I must make a chart, print it and pop it in the book as a bookmark.)

But anyway. This all leads me to one of the many passages in the book I enjoyed...

Walking back to take posession of his new bedroom, he and the salesman passed a line of parked SUV - tall fat station wagons, in effect, called Expedition or Explorer, absurdities for the generations to come to shake their heads at in the way that they once marveled at the finned cars of the fifties. 'Do people still buy these?' Frank asked despite himself.

'Sure, what do you mean? Although now you mention it, there is some surplus here at the end of the year.' It was May. 'Long story short, gas is getting too expensive. I drive one of these,' tapping a Lincoln Navigator. 'They're great. They've got a couple of TVs in the back.'

But they're stupid, Frank didn't say. In prisoner's dilemma terms, they were always-defect. They were America saying Fuck Off to the rest of the world. Deliberate waste, in a kind of ritual desecration. Not just denial but defiance, a Götterdämmerung gesture that said: If we're going down we're going to take the whole world with us. And the roads were full of them. And the Gulf Stream had stopped.

'Amazing,' Frank said.

As [livejournal.com profile] tamaranth used to say, all the time: "Oh good, it's not just me."

It amuses me that [livejournal.com profile] lilitheve tells me that gas costs $4 a gallon in the USA now and this is causing people to bitch and whine about how expensive it is. A gallon is 4½ litres; $4 is £2 (close approximations). So they're paying about 56p a litre; the average UK price is currently about £1.16.

In other words, US petrol is less than half the price it is in the next biggest English-speaking developed Western nation.

To quote the Hitchikers' Guide, "I've no bloody sympathy at all." Let's see US prices rise to parity with, say, EU averages and then we might see the disappearance of their energy-hogging leviathan automobiles. Better late than never.

P. S. Yes, I know it's a vastly bigger country. Yes, I know they have a very poor public transport infrastructure compared to us in most places. Tough. Whose fault is this? The current situation has been visible as it approached for, conservatively, decades - pretty much all my life.
lproven: (Default)
"The British are sniffy about sci-fi, but there is nothing artificial in its ability to convey apprehension about the universe and ourselves.

... The big problem with being sniffy about SF is that it’s just too important to ignore. After all, what kind of fool would refuse to be seen reading Borges’s Labyrinths, Stanislaw Lem’s Fiasco, Orwell’s 1984, Huxley’s Brave New World or Wells’s War of the Worlds just because they were SF? These are just good books, irrespective of genre. But they are also books that embody the big ideas of the time – both Wells and Lem were obsessed with human insignificance in the face of the immense otherness of the universe, Huxley with technology as a seductive destroyer and Orwell with our capacity for authoritarian evil. Borges, like Lem, suspects we know nothing of ourselves. Interested in these things? Of course you are. Read SF..."
Bryan Appleyard in the Sunday Times
lproven: (Default)
Did that 2nd spot on BBC Radio London last night, too. I wibbled a bit, 'cos they asked me about conspiracy theories and not about "Jonathan Black"'s apparently somewhat barking book after all.

Actually the book looks like it might be a hoot to read, but - as I pointed out - about as plausible and believable as the Illuminatus trilogy. Which is to say, not at all, just steering close enough to sanity and reality that you want to believe it.

I listened to the show for a while afterwards, until I had to do some telephone support for a friend of mine. Several people phoned in to comment on things I'd said, like the harmlessness of the Freemasons and the danger of fundie religious loonies of every and all hues and creeds.

It would be fun if this turned into a regular spot. Watch this space.
lproven: (Default)
Well, that was a full weekend. My cat is in hiding, my garage is once more my own and is half way through a massive reorganization, my house is slightly but significantly emptier of stuff I don't want - the last of Kjersti's stuff that I'm not actively using is gone. Oh, and I might just have sold my first book.

But what I thought I'd put here today was a little bit of a message from an email list I'm on, about why I love the writing of Terry Pratchett.

An acquaintance was saying that he rates Guards, Guards as one of the very best of TP's books, along with Carpe Jugulum, The Last Continent, Maskerade, The Truth, Witches Abroad  and Wyrd Sisters - and also Nanny Ogg's Cookbook - and much better than Small Gods. I had to reply...Read more... )

Profile

lproven: (Default)
Liam Proven

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 25th, 2026 03:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios